Case Study

Inspect-to-Clean vs. Clean-to-Inspect

This downloadable case study shows the 30% of cost (vs. traditional clean-to-inspect methods) that can be saved by inspecting 100% of your system but only cleaning the 20% which requires cleaning prior to inspection.

A study of 7 cities (a 2 million foot data set) found only 20% of the systems were significantly obstructed and 75% of pipes required no cleaning. A city with 200,000 ft of pipeline undertaking their first inspect-to-clean project would save $100,000 over the cost of a clean-to-inspect project.

  • Inspect 100% of the system
  • Clean the 20% significantly obstructed
  • Save 30% of cost ($100,000 for a 200,000 foot system)
Thank you! You can download the case study
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.